Changes

Summary

  1. we have both doWithIndex: and withIndexDo:. This PR does *not* try to (details)
  2. fix comment (details)
Commit d85fa03e55560ff1bbc93e1845b2c7ca4e25ee62 by marcus.denker
we have both doWithIndex: and withIndexDo:. This PR does *not* try to
solve that problem. Instead it just unifies the implementation -
doWithIndex: was implemented on HashedCollection, the other not -->
implement withIndexDo: on Collection. - implement doWithIndex: just in
Collection to forward to #withIndexDo:
The file was modifiedsrc/Collections-Abstract/HashedCollection.class.st (diff)
The file was modifiedsrc/Collections-Abstract/SequenceableCollection.class.st (diff)
The file was modifiedsrc/Collections-Abstract/Collection.class.st (diff)
The file was modifiedsrc/Collections-Abstract/Collection.class.st (diff)

Summary

  1. we have both doWithIndex: and withIndexDo:. This PR does *not* try to (details)
  2. fix comment (details)
Commit d85fa03e55560ff1bbc93e1845b2c7ca4e25ee62 by marcus.denker
we have both doWithIndex: and withIndexDo:. This PR does *not* try to
solve that problem. Instead it just unifies the implementation -
doWithIndex: was implemented on HashedCollection, the other not -->
implement withIndexDo: on Collection. - implement doWithIndex: just in
Collection to forward to #withIndexDo:
The file was modifiedsrc/Collections-Abstract/HashedCollection.class.st (diff)
The file was modifiedsrc/Collections-Abstract/Collection.class.st (diff)
The file was modifiedsrc/Collections-Abstract/SequenceableCollection.class.st (diff)
The file was modifiedsrc/Collections-Abstract/Collection.class.st (diff)